Opinion:
On Savarkar And Gandhi, Rajnath Singh's Lie
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Brinda
Karat
+++++++++++++++
October
14, 2021
+++
Shri Rajnath Singh, on the occasion of the release of a book on VD Savarkar
said, "Lies are spread about Savarkar repeatedly. It was spread that he
filed many mercy petitions seeking his release from jails. It was Mahatma
Gandhi who asked him to file the mercy petitions...."
So
here we have, perhaps for the first time, a senior leader of the BJP admitting
that their icon Savarkar, had in fact written mercy petitions to the British.
To
whitewash the contrast of their icon who cravenly begged for mercy compared to
the heroes of the freedom struggle who braved the torture and inhuman
conditions of the jail in the Andamans in their courageous defiance of British
rule, the BJP now wants to invoke the name of Gandhi. Gandhi-ji himself was
arrested eleven times by the British.
Did
he make a single apology to the British to be let off?
Let's
go by the pithy saying: never argue about matters of facts - or another -
search for truth from facts.
Those
wanting to know facts may like to study the highly informative, educative,
meticulously-researched writings of AG Noorani on the subject of Savarkar.
As
Noorani points out in his book Savarkar and Hindutva, and also in his essay
Savarkar's Mercy Petition, which he successfully unearthed from the National
Archives of India, Savarkar wrote not one but several petitions of mercy to the
British.
He
was arrested by the British on separate charges of murder and abetment to
murder of British officers. He was incarcerated in the Andamans jail in June
1911.
Savarkar's
first petition for mercy was sent within a few months of his arrest. Although
the text of that 1911 petition is not available, he referred to it in his
second petition to the British authorities on November 14, 1913.
He
wrote "I remind your Honour to be so good as to go through the petition
for clemency I had sent in 1911..." and further, "I am ready to serve
the Government in any capacity they like...the mighty alone can be merciful and
therefore where else can the prodigal son return but to the parental doors of
the Government..."
These
petitions actually pledged the offender to serving the British. Between 1911
and 1913, when these two mercy petitions had been written by Savarkar,
Gandhi-ji was in South Africa.
He
returned to India only in 1915. How then could he have advised Savarkar to
plead for mercy? These facts prove that Rajnath Singh's claim is utterly false.
In
1914, Savarkar again asked for mercy, this time promising he would serve the
British in any capacity they chose. He also asked for clemency for all
political prisoners.
He
believed a general amnesty would help his own release and that of his brother.
He reiterated this demand in 1917. Thus there were at least four mercy
petitions, three of them assuring full support to the British, signed by
Savarkar before any contact had been made with Gandhi regarding their case.
According
to material published in the Collected Works of Gandhi, it was only in January
1920 that Gandhi received a letter from the third Savarkar brother pleading for
advice on what should be done to get his two brothers released.
Gandhi's
reply was clear enough. He wrote "I have your letter. It is difficult to
advise you. I suggest, however, your framing a brief petition setting forth the
facts of the case bringing out in clear relief the fact that the offence
committed by your brother was purely political."
What
Savarkar wrote to the British was not at all what Gandhi advised. On the
contrary, it was (once again) cringe-worthy, promising the British utmost
loyalty and a pledge to work for the British. He wrote that his release would
"render me personally attached and politically useful".
It
is an insult to Gandhi's memory to distort the note written by Gandhi to claim
that Savarkar's actions were on Gandhi's advice. They had nothing in common.
Moreover,
the point to be noted is that these mercy petitions were no ordinary ones. It
was not unusual for prisoners to plead for clemency on health or humanitarian
grounds.
This
would enable them to get out of jail. Many prisoners were in fact released by
the British on such grounds. But Savarkar's mercy petitions pledged allegiance
to the Crown and indeed promised to work for the British. And on his release in
1924, this is exactly what he did.
From
his first mercy petition in 1911, describing himself as a "son" of
the British Government, to his promise in 1920 to be politically useful to a
colonial power, Savarkar's distance from the values of India's freedom struggle
cannot be bridged by manufacturing history or in distorting it as was sought to
be done by Rajnath Singh.
It
seems that he spoke on the basis of a biased RSS briefing. The RSS, as we know,
is like a Union Minister in a Ministry of Defence of Untruths to obfuscate
truth and facts.
Mohan
Bhagwat, the RSS chief, was also present on the occasion. He made the claim
that Savarkar was never anti-Muslim, the evidence of which was his writing
ghazals in Urdu!
The
highly-divisive Hindutva concept and ideology propagated by Savarkar is thus
sought to be whitewashed. Hindutva is a political concept which has nothing to
do with religious beliefs.
As
is well-known, it was Savarkar who, in his Presidential address to the Hindu
Mahasabha in 1935, first described Muslims and Hindus as two separate nations.
This suited the British policy of divide and rule.
The
core of the ideology links religion with nationalism on the theory that only
those for whom the fatherland or pitrbhumi is also the holy land or punyabhumi
can be accepted as children of mother India, thus effectively excluding Muslims
and Christians from being citizens of what he considered India to be the Hindu
nation or rashtra.
Gandhi-ji
was killed by those who were inspired by this ideology. Today that ideology is
being glorified by those in power. How many more times will he be killed?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Brinda
Karat is a Politburo member of the CPI(M) and a former Member of the Rajya
Sabha.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Posted
by : R.Vimala Vidya
No comments:
Post a Comment